Sweat equity means that someone involved in the farm business is being paid below market rate in anticipation of a future return on their labour. Essentially, rather than investing money into the farm business, they are investing their time, energy, and “sweat.” The value of the farm business, and also the land, may be preserved or increased as a result (at least partially) of this person’s contribution.
Sweat equity often comes up in farm transition planning, especially when discussing the contributions of the entering farmer. Sweat equity can be a pathway to ownership for entering farmers who may not have the capital needed to purchase the farm and land outright, by trading unpaid labour for an ownership stake in the land and/or farm business.
Calculating sweat equity is complex and requires clarity, documentation, and discussion of expectations for both the entering farmer, current farmer, and any off-farm family heirs well before the transitioning process occurs.
Clear communication is key so that both parties understand the value of the entering farmer’s labour and how that will be compensated in the long-term. Having something in writing ensures that the sweat equity agreement is realized long-term, and protects against conflicts, failed businesses and broken relationships.
For sweat equity to work, all parties must have a clear understanding of the farm’s financial state. A good question to ask is: where would the farm be without the entering farmer’s unpaid labour? To understand the full value of the entering farmer’s contributions, it is essential to put a dollar amount on the value of the land and farm business at the start of a sweat equity agreement, and again at a later date, in order to evaluate the growth in value resulting from the entering farmer’s contributions.
While sweat equity can be a way for entering farmers to build an ownership stake in a farm business over time, it can also hide the fact that a farm is not as profitable as needed to support the entering farmer. If the farm’s value decreases instead of increasing, the entering farmer’s return on the sweat equity investment may be zero. Some transition plans opt to avoid sweat equity altogether by employing the entering farmer at market rate. Assuming the farm is profitable, being able to pay fair market wage demonstrates that there is capacity to add one or more additional farmers.
Sweat equity can be used as part of a purchase involving a cash down payment. Take the example of a young couple buying a farm in part with cash and in part with sweat equity. With a sweat equity purchase, the buyer is paying off all, or a portion of, the agreed cost of a property through labour. With start-up costs so high, it may be an essential way to transfer farms to the next generation.